MIN68-75 · AWAY
CHW75-68 · HOMEMinnesota Twins @ Chicago White Sox
Take Chicago White Sox +102 @ betrivers.
Player prop lines aren't tracked yet at the free tier -- no prop-line comparison is available for this game.
13 game updates
Experimental estimates recorded during the game, based on the pregame market, score, and game progress. They are not the final result or a live sportsbook line.
| Market | Minnesota Twins | Chicago White Sox |
|---|---|---|
| ML | +111espnbet | −125espnbet |
| RL | +1.5 −182betrivers | −1.5 +165espnbet |
| Total | O 9 −114fanduel | U 9 +100fanatics |
Pregame closing line — LeagueMind doesn't track live in-game odds yet. As of Sep 4, 7:25 PM EST.
Closed Chicago White Sox -1.5 after opening +1.5.
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 |
| CHW | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 4 | 6 | 1 |
Vargas homered to right center (382 feet).
B. Montgomery homered to right center (419 feet).
C. Montgomery homered to right center (416 feet), Benintendi scored.
Bell homered to right center (460 feet).
Hitters
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K | #P | AVG | OBP | SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | .248 | .297 | .432 |
 | 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | .200 | .500 | .200 |
 | 2-3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 18 | .258 | .322 | .425 |
 | 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 13 | .301 | .359 | .458 |
 | 3-4 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | .241 | .300 | .470 |
 | 0-5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | .275 | .365 | .391 |
 | 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | .238 | .304 | .407 |
 | 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 17 | .272 | .372 | .498 |
 | 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | .266 | .350 | .422 |
 | 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 17 | .130 | .286 | .304 |
Take Chicago White Sox +102 @ betrivers. The 7-book consensus prices this outcome at 52.2% true probability, a 2.7 percentage-point edge over this price's implied probability (+5.4% expected value per unit staked).
Books disagree on this price more than usual (68/100 market agreement), so the consensus edge may be softer than it looks. Only 0 odds pulls landed in the 26-hour lookback window, so we cannot tell whether this line has been moving — the line-stability part of this pick's trust score is a neutral placeholder, not a measurement.
